[REJECTED] [Druid] Rake vs Rip (dot damage)

andyx23 · Posted: 29-09-2013, 18:48:28 | Translate post to: ... (Click for more languages)

So if u can explain this to me please do it.
How can my Rake (dot) damage can be higher then Rip(dot) damage.
Proof: Rake(dot) : http://i.imgur.com/yDDjc2i.jpg
Proof: Rip(dot) : http://i.imgur.com/2HZHRsB.jpg
This is about the critical damage.
Both spells were used after back proc, TF and trinket activated.

Nerd · Posted: 29-09-2013, 21:47:47 | Translate post to: ... (Click for more languages)

Pai sunt 2 posibilitati :

1. Nu ai folosit rip cu 5 cp.
2. Daca aveai 5 cp, nu ai pus si rake si rip in aceleasi conditii.

"Munca l-a creat pe om, dar nici lenea n-a omorat pe nimeni."

Arrchangel · Posted: 29-09-2013, 22:09:40 | Translate post to: ... (Click for more languages)

Damage-ul la cele doua spelluri e foarte apropiat, poate sa fie unul sau altul mai mare, in functie de gear. Eu am diferenta gen 23.5k la rake si 23.9k la rip.

andyx23 · Posted: 29-09-2013, 22:56:00 | Translate post to: ... (Click for more languages)

Ambele au fosr puse in acelasi timp

Nerd · Posted: 30-09-2013, 01:18:18 | Translate post to: ... (Click for more languages)

andyx23 wrote:

Ambele au fosr puse in acelasi timp

Atunci nu ai pus rip cu 5cp. Rip da mereu mai mult ca rake daca e pus cu 5 cp si in aceleasi conditii, nu te mai contrazice aiurea.

"Munca l-a creat pe om, dar nici lenea n-a omorat pe nimeni."

Melfy · Posted: 30-09-2013, 08:28:02 | Translate post to: ... (Click for more languages)

Merge bine, e cum a zis nerd.

i.imgur.com/uRM2d6c.jpg

i.imgur.com/EMTlrJ6.jpg

^there, fara buffs / procs.

Naturezftw · Posted: 30-09-2013, 13:11:15 | Translate post to: ... (Click for more languages)

Rip e da damage mai mare ca Rake. Nu stiu ce ai testat tu acolo.
Invalid.