Opinions about rated 2v2 solo que

[Jamaal]

Fellow PvP-ers,

How would you guys feel about introducing the 2v2 rated solo que option?
I find that it would be a great improvement to the pvp scene overall since it would somewhat be a more balanced version of skirmishes.
Besides, 3s are close to dead but Im sure there would be quite some players who would que for 2s instead.
Not to mention, a decent pvp-er wouldnt have to go dragon slay for gear, he d just get it by fighting (and succeding!) in the arena.

It would be amazing if the fellow (few) pvpers from freakz could chip in and agree or dissagree to the idea of implementing that .

I'm sorry if this "poll" doesnt belong here. Im sure it can be moved to the proper forum section if it doesn't.

Thank you in advance for your imput,
Jamaal

Update @ 06-04-2018, 20:58:01

I'll "vote" first and say that i agree to having a 2v2 solo rated que

[Stayfjurt]

-q for 20 wins in 3v3 { 0,2 % chance to get mount , lets say from 2 }
-make skirmish 3v3 as on retail { atleast we avoid cancerous premades like double BM which is unbeatable }

problem solved , ppl start queing 3s , no 2s soloque , only 3s are real arenas , whole pvp is balanced around them

thats my opinion

[1007]

Rated solo 2v2 sounds great, but I suggested(12-11-2017) to not allow healers there at all.

As for rated solo 3v3... we already have this implemented, the problem is teams can not form without healers in each team(bad idea)... therefore no surprise fun didn't last long, at the end all healers got bored or idk("reasons"), they just stopped to join. End of story.


Choose Who You Want To Become

[Jamaal]

Thank you for your reply 1007. It does sound like a good idea to make them like that since it would offer some balance