[DUPLICATE] [Warlock] damage

[Taby777]

WoW Freakz spell link: https://www.wow-freakz.com/spells.php?spell=30108&&&&name=unstable-affliction , https://www.wow-freakz.com/spells.php?spell=172&&&&name=corruption , https://www.wow-freakz.com/spells.php?spell=980&&&&name=agony
Bug description: UA, corruption, agony isnt correct. i am not found card on trello for this bug
Proof: https://imgur.com/a/AggL1Wu

[Miikee]

And what exactly might be wrong with the damage?

[Metabolism]

The formula damage is lower than it's supposed to be ? That's what is wrong here. @Miikee

Update @ 27-04-2020, 11:16:34

And it's really incorrect for UA as long as here it says 8 seconds on target ( https://prnt.sc/s6moi8 - retail 7.3.5 )
And on Freakz in-game ( https://prnt.sc/s6mq6c ) - ( https://prnt.sc/s6mqlo )

[Jasim]

Metabolism wrote:

The formula damage is lower than it's supposed to be ? That's what is wrong here. @Miikee Update @ 27-04-2020, 11:16:34 And it's really incorrect for UA as long as here it says 8 seconds on target ( https://prnt.sc/s6moi8 - retail 7.3.5 ) And on Freakz in-game ( https://prnt.sc/s6mq6c ) - ( https://prnt.sc/s6mqlo )

I think you forgot that haste reduces the duration on tooltip for UA.
https://imgur.com/a/2NqnHdw here you can see that tooltip states same as retail without gear.

Also about the formula damage is perfectly fine for all three DoT's, I don't see anything wrong there.

[Riborn]

@Miikee


7.2.5
https://youtube.com/watch?v=6854yo9H17o:




7.3.5
https://youtube.com/watch?v=3AKevmp03tM:



7.2.5 Agony
https://youtube.com/watch?v=Ik56ZI_cgps:



7.3.5 Agony
https://youtube.com/watch?v=jehkIXbgOlA:

[Metabolism]

@Riborn WOOOW really nice catch over there with proof <3

[Jasim]

Riborn wrote:

@Miikee 7.2.5 https://youtube.com/watch?v=6854yo9H17o: 7.3.5 https://youtube.com/watch?v=3AKevmp03tM: 7.2.5 Agony https://youtube.com/watch?v=Ik56ZI_cgps: 7.3.5 Agony https://youtube.com/watch?v=jehkIXbgOlA:

Keep in mind there were some hotfixes in 7.3.5 for Agony/Corruption/UA. So comparing from 7.2.5 its not the best.

Here is the proof. 6% nerf to Agony/Corruption x2 times, 4% nerf to UA.

https://worldofwarcraft.com/en-us/news/21365424/hotfixes-june-26
https://worldofwarcraft.com/en-us/news/21025532/hotfixes-december-1

[Taby777]

On offi warlock 980 ilvl have better dmg than my 990 not wrong? Check warcraftlogs

[Riborn]

Odyn 17 Key

Agony


Corruption


Life Dot

Make more dmg as Agony and Corruption ??????

Find the Fail
@Jasmin we have 3x more Stats in 7.3.5. This Dot dmg is very low sorry

[Taby777]

https://forum.wow-freakz.com/Warlock-Dots-Damage-t574773.html
This is confirmed

[Metabolism]

Taby777 wrote:

https://forum.wow-freakz.com/Warlock-Dots-Damage-t574773.html This is confirmed

Yes but it doesn't seem from Miikee's answer that is something wrong here . Ofc there is!

[Miikee]

I checked math on both of my characters(test&live).
Lets say corruption.
This test was made on the test realm.
My stats are:
86854 intellect
139,62% mastery
14% passive
46% artifact
3,74% versatility

SP coefficient for one corruption tick is 32,4%
That means that baseline corruption does is 28140,696 dmg.

When increased by mastery (139,62%) corruption does 67430,7357552.
After increased by passive aura (14%) it does 76871,038760928
On my currently equipped artifact i have a 46% dmg increase on corruption, that brings it up to 112231,7165909549
After adding the 3,74% bonus from versatility The dot should do 116429,176328

Currently on a dummy target it's doing 122004 dmg.
As you can see, corruption is actually doing more damage then expected, about 4,7% more.
https://imgur.com/a/tyfrHIF

Please do your math and post a reply of how exactly might your damage be off.

[ryangg]

The problem is formula of the damage ...

[Taby777]

SP koeficient for corruption is 226,8%
https://imgur.com/a/AggL1Wu

[Riborn]

@Miikee

Exactly what Taby777 writes. And this has already been posted several times and the discusion is slowly going on the pointer

Please do it right -.-

You take the values of Freakz. I don't know how many more times we have to give them the evidence as it is right

@Jasim Exactly the same they write and also confirm Miikee his things that are completely wrong



I feel like you are not even looking at the links from the logs that are correct
https://imgur.com/a/AggL1Wu <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<