What stops you from adding Rated battlegrounds?

Nevinafreaklol · Posted: 26-10-2014, 15:05:54 | Translate post to: ... (Click for more languages)

So now that madness is scripted, what stops you from scripting Rated battlegrounds? i know this question has been posted few times already probably but i don't think we had appropriate answer.

mayavin · Posted: 26-10-2014, 18:03:35 | Translate post to: ... (Click for more languages)

Answer to your question: No one played rated battlegrounds when they were implemented on 4.0.6 so we don't see the point to implement them now, since there is a lot of work to do. We will see in the future.

Nevinafreaklol · Posted: 26-10-2014, 18:18:28 | Translate post to: ... (Click for more languages)

No one played them? More like they are bugged as hell. Just make a poll and see how many people would vote for it. I'm pretty sure every single Pvp player would like to see rated battlegrounds if they are scripted properly. And about "there is a lot work to do" if you think that scripting dungeons or fixing firelands is more important than rated battlegrounds, you are wrong.

Zalekozbg · Posted: 26-10-2014, 18:21:31 | Translate post to: ... (Click for more languages)

i think it will be a good idea to fix more battlegrounds first.

Yakul · Posted: 26-10-2014, 18:26:23 | Translate post to: ... (Click for more languages)

I'd like RBGs very much as well since no1 gave a single *** for BG event (players and GMs). But I think they are trying to fix MoP as much as possible since they will open it in Dec. from what I heard.

mayavin · Posted: 26-10-2014, 19:57:16 | Translate post to: ... (Click for more languages)

Nevinafreaklol wrote:

if you think that scripting dungeons or fixing firelands is more important than rated battlegrounds, you are wrong.

I never said that.

Nevinafreaklol wrote:

And about "there is a lot work to do"

You misunderstood me, or I wasn't very clear. There is a lot of work to do in order to implement rated BGs.

Zalekozbg wrote:

i think it will be a good idea to fix more battlegrounds first.

I agree to that.

Yakul wrote:

I'd like RBGs very much as well since no1 gave a single *** for BG event (players and GMs). But I think they are trying to fix MoP as much as possible since they will open it in Dec. from what I heard.

We learn from mistakes. It was mentioned numerous times that there will be a PTR MOP realm. When? It will be announced on the site.

Gudbror · Posted: 26-10-2014, 22:12:34 | Translate post to: ... (Click for more languages)

mayavin wrote:

Answer to your question: No one played rated battlegrounds when they were implemented on 4.0.6 so we don't see the point to implement them now, since there is a lot of work to do. We will see in the future.

Thats some mediocre thinking, rbgs would add something new for pvp players, its been more than a year since you guys have done anything new for pvp.

mayavin · Posted: 26-10-2014, 22:20:13 | Translate post to: ... (Click for more languages)

As I mentioned in a previous post, perhaps in the future.

Yakul · Posted: 26-10-2014, 22:54:05 | Translate post to: ... (Click for more languages)

3v3 is kind of dead, you see a team here and there and they are almost always in q just because they want title on the end on the season (which is why newbies (90% of server (no offense)) almost never join cause they get rekt). So RBGs even tho most people want them including me, people probably wouldn't play it or wouldn't have an opponent. I gotta say that I agree with GMs here and I think it's more important to get decent PTR MoP.

PS. It's off the topic and it's probably useless now but I'll say it anyways. You should've removed donor items from pvp. If someone is playing both pvp and pve in that case he could've been 'rewarded' by giving him permission to use Gurths, Kirils, etc. in pvp. (Meaning he got it legit not by donating).

Kathie · Posted: 28-10-2014, 13:33:48 | Translate post to: ... (Click for more languages)

Why are you even considering of opening a mop server, it will be bugged as hell for 2+ years just like cata server is still bugged. Im sorry for telling you this, but you guys aint fast enough to fix the bugs that are still major issue for pvp. If you look at pve, the bugs does not matter there, cuz all they do is tunnel one giant boss.

You should reconsider this "mop opening".

DisCosmin · Posted: 28-10-2014, 15:33:53 | Translate post to: ... (Click for more languages)

Kathie wrote:

If you look at pve, the bugs does not matter there, cuz all they do is tunnel one giant boss.

Erm, what? Raised eyebrow

there's not only the bosses' bugs that affect the pve , it's also the bugs of each class , that includes pvp fixes too doesn't it?

Incarnate · Posted: 28-10-2014, 17:43:22 | Translate post to: ... (Click for more languages)

Kathie wrote:

Why are you even considering of opening a mop server, it will be bugged as hell for 2+ years just like cata server is still bugged.
...
You should reconsider this "mop opening".

+1

Needlegunxz · Posted: 28-10-2014, 17:51:19 | Translate post to: ... (Click for more languages)

cata is boring.open mop.

gathering2 · Posted: 28-10-2014, 17:54:09 | Translate post to: ... (Click for more languages)

Needlegunxz wrote:

cata is boring.open mop.

+1

tudor1297 · Posted: 28-10-2014, 20:01:33 | Translate post to: ... (Click for more languages)

the thing is that most of the PvE players, maybe even PvP players are starting to get bored
so cataclysm won't hold much longer, and players will eventually go to other servers which have already opened mop realms.

so that's why mop is needed on freakz as well

about the rated battlegrounds, it's just not worth it. I've seen rbgs on 4.0.6, my guild queued 'cause we needed the guild achiev and there were no other teams in queue...
I don't see the point of rbg's until the server gets more players

[RO]Warrior Fury PvE Guide 5.4.8

[EN]Warrior Fury PvE Guide 5.4.8