Search found 26 matches

1)
This dig side @ Aerie Peaks, Hinterlands, cannot be survey'd:
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/801/wowscrnshot051512185925.jpg/ (On this slope)
http://imageshack.us/f/716/wowscrnshot0515121 ...

[quote ascuns]

[quote ascuns]
Surprises, surprises.
Nice work!

[quote ascuns]
You misunderstood me - I didn't intend to twist your argument, I simply stated what I think is the biggest problem of AV in the first place. Underpopulation is the problem, but it's a symptom, not a cause. I'm not aiming to be the kind of person who has to malform a conversation to win an internet argument.

[quote ascuns]
If that's t ...

Yes, shadow89, you totally sound like you know what you're talking about.
Sorry to burst your hopes, but DDoS - One of the most blunt attacks, can never be fully stopped, it's effects can only be minimized (Ideally, up to a point where the service doesn't drop in performance of handling normal requests).
And, for 400 euro, you can protect your service from maybe mosquitos, but not DDoS.

[quote ascuns]
So, you swing ignorance at me because I disagreed with your post.
Maybe you're unaware of the fact that the reason AV is not balanced, number wise, is because people leave it. They leave it, because they can't play it, no matter how they mask their words. If people didn't leave AV, then it would be balanced - I often played 40v40 AVs and it was fine, bar for the fact 35 out of 40 would just wander aimlessly.
The situation you link (31v ...

For once, I have to agree with Architech, and I don't know why some people go offensive on the idea.
Horde -> Alliance transfers until factions are even, would be a good idea, and anyone can see Alliance is greatly undernumbered.
Another idea would be to make faction transfer H->A, or transfer from other realms to Exodus-Alliance cheaper for some time, I guess it's less invasive.

As far as I know, it's simply not working. The entire profession.

CLOSE AV!!!
No. Why close the most classic and interesting battleground, just because people are too lazy/ignorant to get to know what's it about?
This is the only battleground which you can win even if you're losing due to brute force of the opposing side. As such, I like it.

capmoq, if you knew more about any IT development process, you'd know that most bugs happen to appear from user-feedback, ESPECIALLY in an enviroment which can't be reliably reproduced in a closed test (Read: they don't have 25 GMs raiding / a GM with every single class/spec doing 20 arena games with each character, every update ).
So stay off the GameMasters, just do your best at reporting bugs in the most detailed way possible.

[quote ascuns]
Complicated? What's complicated in it?
1) Knockback players from starting area
2) Periodically knockback players from middle area, spawn water gameobject
That's pretty much it. Gameobject should be causing line of sight errors, but that's already working on Trinity Core for example so it's not impossible to incorporate that (Dunno what emu we're running on), or make an easy workaround

[quote ascuns]
Hmm, I'm sorry, it seems the info is removed from there.
Chromaggus has a "Chromatic skin" that will make him take 400% damage from one school of magic, and take reduced damage from all others. Every now and then, he switches the resistance school. Therefore, every now and then he takes massive damage from Shadow.

[quote ascuns]
http://www.wowhead.com/npc=14020 I recommend reading.

that much, but it kind of doesn't make sense atm...

Architech, reading your crap is just a waste of time. You attempt to speak "in the name of every average player", but all I see is selfishness, envy and some kid's rage. You say you turned 24, I say stop using it as an excuse and keeping to act like 12, you still have to grow up to it.
You're playing for free (as am I), so you'll be the last person to order the server around.
"server's down for 2 weeks, i would have gotten 2 items on average, so I deserve 50 voting points" - What are you, working here? Or playing a computer game?
Besides, it's not like it's their fault that the server is in it's current state. If the messages about DDoSes and all, are true (Which I assume), then it doesn't take an IT person to tell that it's not an easy or instanteous problem to get rid of.

That's good, but proving it by "come at me, duel!" isn't a good way to do it

But I agree, a guy who relies on 9v1 advantage to brag about it, definitely deserves that.