PvP Season names / rewards

[rikymaru94]

Alyseum wrote:

I think it would be better if you increase the number of awards. For example on other servers (f******, P********) the number of awards a lot more. People will be happy that their work will be rewarded, so it can increase interest in 3s. So why not increase the number of prizes? 4500 players on the server, though. My suggestion: - PvP Seasons duration: 3 months - Start from Legion titles (then go to Draenor). - Titles only for 3s 1-9: r1 glad 10-18: glad 19-27: duelist 28-36: rival 37-45: challenger.

hahaha ha
on topic. people that rly want to have r1 title/glad will struggle for it and play to prove what they can.whats the point of giving glad to 30 people .after 3 months all the pvp players (20) will have glad ?what after.play bgs or start crying on global with their achivement ''gladiator'' at 1600 rate. im sick of this
''I have friends who would come from other projects (including retail), but they don't see the point, because the number of awards is very limited.'' if they'r rly pvp players they'll try to do the best to get the title.not queing vs 1.5 players reaching 1.6k and after that waiting for the season end to get title.
ps.@soker: what do u say after every pvp season to make a pvp tournament with tbc-lk-cata titles,mounts/tabards and some $ ingame.


""Îmi cunosc limitele. Dar pur ºi simplu le ignor."

[Alyseum]

rikymaru94 wrote:

Alyseum wrote: I think it would be better if you increase the number of awards. For example on other servers (f******, P********) the number of awards a lot more. People will be happy that their work will be rewarded, so it can increase interest in 3s. So why not increase the number of prizes? 4500 players on the server, though. My suggestion: - PvP Seasons duration: 3 months - Start from Legion titles (then go to Draenor). - Titles only for 3s 1-9: r1 glad 10-18: glad 19-27: duelist 28-36: rival 37-45: challenger. hahaha ha on topic. people that rly want to have r1 title/glad will struggle for it and play to prove what they can.whats the point of giving glad to 30 people .after 3 months all the pvp players (20) will have glad ?what after.play bgs or start crying on global with their achivement ''gladiator'' at 1600 rate. im sick of this ''I have friends who would come from other projects (including retail), but they don't see the point, because the number of awards is very limited.'' if they'r rly pvp players they'll try to do the best to get the title.not queing vs 1.5 players reaching 1.6k and after that waiting for the season end to get title. ps.@soker: what do u say after every pvp season to make a pvp tournament with tbc-lk-cata titles,mounts/tabards and some $ ingame.

Mate u read carefully?
I offer to give titles ONLY FOR 3S.
Of course we will go to the arena, but we want to do as a lot of people.

Kindredz wrote:

3v3 1-3 : Rank 1 Gladiator 4-6 : Gladiator 7-9 : Duelist 10-13 : Rival 14- 16 : Challenger 2v2 1-4 Duelist 5-8- Rival 9-12 - Challenger Soloq 1-3 Immortal 4-6 Warbringer 7-9 Duelist 10-13 Rival 14- 16 Challenger 17-19 Hero of the Alliance/Horde ps: fix soloq please

16+12+19=47
I offer to give the same number of awards, but ONLY FOR 3S.
I think it will revive que. I don't think you like low activity.

[Magicqtz]

First of all, soloq is not working, so no point for titles there.
If 3v3 will be dinamic and a lot of teams, can be adjust through season (more titles), but from experience there are 3-4-5 teams maxim who play. So the titles will remain as was before. See Kindreadz post.
@Alyseum don't compare other server with freakz about PvP. After AT, when was existing, freakz was the second competitive PvP player base. May be an option to give rank 1 to the first team and gladiator title next 2 teams instead of 1 like now, but not in any case reaching 18.

But only this if season is very active.

https://worldofwarcraft.com/en-gb/character/sylvanas/mostfckedup

[raven3]

Magicqtz wrote:

First of all, soloq is not working, so no point for titles there. If 3v3 will be dinamic and a lot of teams, can be adjust through season (more titles), but from experience there are 3-4-5 teams maxim who play. So the titles will remain as was before. See Kindreadz post. @Alyseum don't compare other server with freakz about PvP. After AT, when was existing, freakz was the second competitive PvP player base. May be an option to give rank 1 to the first team and gladiator title next 2 teams instead of 1 like now, but not in any case reaching 18. But only this if season is very active.

I agree with this.
If .. let's say top 100 at 3v3 are all above 2k rate then it would make sense for 6 players to get glad, duelist, rival and challenger.
But rank 1 titles should be set at 3 spots. Unless the participation is really high..

[bryaniscool]

2v2 shouldnt award anything like in retail except maybe mounts, but no titles that should only be awarded from 3s

[Magicqtz]

A final verdict? And also maybe a start date of the season?

https://worldofwarcraft.com/en-gb/character/sylvanas/mostfckedup

[raven3]

OK.. so I gave it a lot of thought and I think I have a system that would stimulate 3v3.
But it all depends on if there could be implemented a system to wipe previous titles.
As we all know on blizz only rank 1 titles are permanent and the rest are only temporarily.
So you get gladiator, duelist, rival, challenger at the end of S1 ... you have them during S2 and before S3 starts they are wiped and the titles based on S2 are being given.
If this system would work then what I propose is this - as blizzlike as possible.
arena titles only at 3v3 rated and 3v3 soloq should get rbg titles

So:
1-3(3) or first 0.1% characters over 1000 rating - Rank 1 title.
4-6(3) or first 0.5% characters over 1000 rating - Gladiator title
7-12(6) or first 3% characters over 1000 rating - Duelist title
13-21(9) or first 10% characters over 1000 rating - Rival title
22-36(15) or first 35% characters over 1000 rating - Challenger title
in this case whichever is higher - the fixed preset number or the percentage. The fix numbers are a failsefe if the participation numbers are low.

title % distribution in legion S1 : https://wowtitlecalc.com/rating/lseason1.html

So let's say that our first season behaves like the 2v2 preseason - the same participation. (because the 3v3 participation was awful - only ~130 characters over 1k)
Right now we have 1000 characters over 1k rate.
So..let's assume that the next 3v3 season wll have 1000 characters over 1k..
first 3 players will get rank 1 title.
first 0.5% will get Gladiator - that means 5 players
first 3% will get duelis - that means first 30 players.
first 10% will get Rival - that means first 100 players.
first 35% will get Challenger - that means first 350 players

I'm allmost positive that this will increase the participation drastically. Because it's very clever - blizz knew what they were doing .
This system is based on getting a title but most important - keeping that title.
But the titles (besides Rank1) should be erased to keep the competitivity on.

At soloq, the Hero of the aliance/Horde should be permanent while the others only temporar.
1-3(3) or first 0.1% characters over 1000 rating - Hero title.
4-6(3) or first 0.5% characters over 1000 rating - Guardian title
7-12(6) or first 3% characters over 1000 rating - Defender title
13-21(9) or first 10% characters over 1000 rating - Soldier title

[Fyury]

Shocker wrote:

I see a lot of votes for "legion", but did you guys actually read the initial post? There are only 2 seasons in legion currently, Vindictive and Fearless, which means we'll run out of names and rewards after just 2 seasons

Thats why we need to start with WoD names + Mounts, then go to Legion.

[hackerzx]

@raven3 What about Rbg's?

[Shocker]

Thank you everyone for giving your thoughts. It seems that a much bigger part of the players want Legion names, so we'll start with those. When we finish all of the legion names, we'll discuss again about what to do next.

See info about the legion here https://www.wow-freakz.com/legion_pvp_season, I'm sure you will be pleased about the rewards

FREAKZ COMMUNITY @ Facebook
WOW FREAKZ @ Facebook